mechaphil wrote:
And if Tampa didn't match, the Sabres would be hand-cuffed for years to come and wouldn't be able to pay Myers and Ennis this season before they hit RFA.
Don't forget the 4-1st rounders you'd be giving up as well. You could trade for quite a bit with them w/o sacrificing your reputation as a GM.
I do understand the original poster's point, and I'm sure it's just a matter of time before RFA sheets are the norm if teams ever become so cap strapped that matching becomes impossible. The ever rising cap is the only thing keeping it in check at this point, imo. If the owners/GMs deem it "dirty play", then why not move to change the rule???? It seems anything that unanimous should be easy to change. Inflated salaries may be bad for owners, but they are also good for players(which is probably why they can't get it changed; can we cite the owners for circumvention????). It's a matter of perspective. At any rate, I find it an interesting topic.